Site search
sponsored by
Lahontan Valley News | Fallon Nevada News
 
Lahontan Valley News | Fallon Nevada News
Error on line 51 position 4: Type mismatch: 'InputParentProfile'
Send us your news
<< back
Thursday, January 8, 2009

Union lawyer accuses TCID of secret contract



By SCOTT SONNER

Associated Press Writer

RENO, Nev. (AP) — A union lawyer accused the Truckee Carson Irrigation District’s board of directors on Thursday of illegally approving a secret contract to finance the legal defense of district officials charged with defrauding the federal government.

The lawyer for the union representing TCID workers also told The Associated Press that all of the approximately half dozen employees who testified before the grand jury that indicted the officials received notice on Thursday they are being laid off.

Michael Langton, representing the Nevada Classified School Employees and Public Workers Local 6181, said he’s investigating whether the layoffs were in retaliation for blowing the whistle on what federal prosecutors say was a conspiracy to falsify records so as to secure extra water supplies from the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.

He estimated the contract with three lawyers that TCID’s board of directors approved on Wednesday was in excess of $100,000. He also questioned whether the board had the authority to spend the money out of funds northern Nevada farmers pay the district to get their share of the water for their crops and livestock.

“I’d like to know where they are getting the money from,” Langton told AP.

“What they are charging farmers has to go for providing water for users, not for defending persons who are accused of violating the law,” he said.

Michael Van Zandt, a lawyer who appeared on behalf of the district in U.S. District Court on Tuesday, did not immediately return a telephone call or e-mail seeking comment.

“My guys were the ones who originally reported what they thought were misdeeds,” Langton said about the union members he represents.

“If they have been retaliated against, it is not only a violation of state law but also federal law,” he said.

“I find it odd they haven’t had layoffs in years and years and years. Then these guys testify and all of the sudden the money is not there, they say they have to lay them off and yet they are paying — in my best guestimate — over $100,000 for their defense,” he said.

The TCID board voted on Dec. 15 to lay off 23 of the district’s 44 positions, citing a budget shortfall and economic downturn. Langton said they include “six or seven” employees who testified before the federal grand jury.

The board agenda for Wednesday’s meeting in Fallon listed an item regarding the lawyer contracts only as “Approve contracts — Denny, Evans and Freeman.”

In federal court on Tuesday, Craig Denney of Reno appeared with Overvold, Scott Freeman of Reno appeared with McConnell and Don Evans appeared with Shelby Cecil, a third TCID employee facing charges. The fourth, John Baker, is being represented by a federal public defender.

Evans maintains the workers who testified before the grand jury are disgruntled employees. Reached for comment on Thursday, he declined to say whether Cecil or TCID was paying his legal fees. He said he was not at the meeting in Fallon Wednesday and didn’t know whether he was included in the contract.

“What (Langton) has to say has no import on anything. It is totally irrelevant,” Evans said.

“I’ve been doing this 30 years and I think they will have an extremely difficult time convicting Shelby Cecil, or anyone for that matter, of anything,” he said. “We are very much amazed they are going forward with this.”

Neither Denney nor Freeman immediately returned telephone calls seeking comment on Thursday.

Langton said Thursday that the board litigation strategy is confidential, but that the contract itself is not. He said the board should make public the contract and redact any material that is legally confidential.

Assistant U.S. Attorney James Keller, who is prosecuting the criminal case, said in court on Tuesday he was concerned there was a conflict of interest if lawyers representing Overvold and McConnell were being paid by the district.


facebook Print
Ads by Google
Comments
Previous Guide Line
Next Guide Line
Sort comments by:
downloading content